The Law Office of Edward Misleh
The Law Office of Edward Misleh
Skip to content
  • Home Page
  • Areas of Practice
    • Divorce Attorney
    • Domestic Violence Attorney
    • Child Custody Attorney
    • Child Support Attorney
    • Spousal Support Attorney
    • Community Property Attorney
    • Guardianship Attorney
    • Family Law Attorney
    • Adoption Attorney
    • California Attorney Blog
  • Resources
    • Forms
    • California Attorney Blog
    • Our Office
    • Website Search
    • Site Map
  • The Law Offices
  • Contact Us

-

Home » Areas of Practice » Community Property » Dividing Divorce Debts

Dividing Divorce Debts

Posted on October 25, 2019February 17, 2020 by edmisleh

Dividing Divorce Debts

Dividing divorce debts can be as simple as one spouse assuming a loan to both spouses being required to execute documents creating new loans for a community asset.  The following are some of the most common occurrences that couples encounter when dividing divorce debts.


Payment of One Spouse’s Credit Card Debt

Dividing divorce debts will include community debts.  The community (the entity created by a marriage) is liable for all debts incurred during the marriage and prior to separation. See California, Family Code §910 for dividing divorce debt.  It doesn’t matter whether the debt was incurred by one spouse for his or her own benefit or for the family.  It also doesn’t matter whose name appears on the bill or the credit card statements.  If it was incurred during the marriage and prior to separation, it’s a community property debt and both spouses are equally liable.  This means that when the parties are negotiating a settlement and tallying the marital balance sheet such debts should be divided equally.  A better option might be that one spouse agrees to pay off the joint debts in return for a greater share of the community property.  The spouse paying off the debts can at least make sure that joint debts are paid, because as long as debts are jointly owed both spouses are financially responsible to the creditors.


Community Payments of a Pre-marital Debt

In dividing divorce debts, one spouse’s debts may not be included.  When one spouse has a huge pre-marriage credit card debt that is paid off during the marriage, the community is entitled to reimbursement.  The couple used community property earnings to pay off  the credit card debt (which was one spouse’s separate property debt) which entitles the community to a reimbursement for the amount it paid to discharge one party’s separate property debts.


Separate Payments on a Community Debt

A married couple, shortly after the marriage ceremony, goes on their honeymoon and racks up a huge credit card debt.  One spouse uses their brokerage account which was built up prior to the marriage to pay off the honeymoon credit card debt.  The spouse who used their separate property to pay off community debts during marriage and before separation, uses separate property to satisfy a community debt is presumed to make a gift to the community.


Separate Payments to Acquire Community Assets

One spouse uses their brokerage account to purchase a home during marriage.  There is one important exception to this rule.  California Family Code §2640 provides that where one party uses their separate property for the acquisition of community property, the paying spouse has a statutory tracing right of reimbursement if the right has not been waived in writing.  Contributions to the acquisition of property include down payments, payments for improvements, and payments that reduce the principal of a loan used to finance the purchase or improvement of property.  They do not include payments of interest on a loan to purchase property, or payments for maintenance, insurance, or taxation of the property.


Separate Property Used for a Community Debt

If one spouse, after separation, uses their separate property earnings or property to pay off community debts, they are entitled to a reimbursement.

One spouse continues using a car purchased during marriage and the other spouse continues paying on the vehicle loan.  The paying spouse can claim a reimbursement credit for all the payments made from the date of separation to the date of trial.  California case law has developed the general rule that a spouse who, after separation, uses earnings or other separate property to pay pre-existing community obligations should be reimbursed out of community property upon dissolution.  These are traditionally called “Epstein credits” after the California Supreme Court case that established the rule.  The one exception to this rule is when the paying spouse is using the asset.  That spouse is not entitled to reimbursement if the amount paid was not substantially in excess of the value of the use.  This means that you cannot claim a credit for monthly payments of a vehicle you are using.

There are two other important exceptions to the Epstein Rule that a spouse who uses separate earnings or property to pay off pre-existing community obligations is entitled to a reimbursement.  One is where there is an agreement between the parties that the payments will not be reimbursed, and two is where the payments were intended as a gift or as child or spousal support.


Use of Community Property Funds for Living Expenses

California case law provides that the community is entitled to reimbursement where one spouse uses community property to pay separate obligations after separation to the extent that exceeds a reasonable amount for child and spousal support.  A reasonable amount would be the amount of guideline support that a court would order in an application for temporary child and spousal support.


Use of the Family Home After Separation

It’s often the case that after separation one spouse moves out of the family home (“the out-spouse”) while the other spouse stays in the home with the children (“the in-spouse”).  The out-spouse, usually the husband, may offer to maintain the status quo by continuing to pay the mortgage payments and other payments such as property taxes to maintain the property.  In such a situation, the in-spouse should be warned that there may be serious consequences of such an arrangement at the time of trial.

One consequence of this arrangement is that the out-spouse paying the mortgage payments may be entitled to Epstein credits because he or she is paying separate property earnings towards a community property debt unless there was an agreement to waive such reimbursements or such payments were a form of child or spousal support.

The other major consequence is that if the reasonable rental value of the family home is more than the mortgage payments, the in-spouse may be required to reimburse the community for the difference in these payments between the date of separation and the date of trial.  These are called Watts charges after the case that established the rule.  The general rule is that where one spouse has the exclusive use of community assets between the date of separation and trial, that spouse may be required to compensate the community for the reasonable value of that use.


CALL NOW TO MAKE AN APPOINTMENT

321-951-9164

For more information on property division and dividing divorce debts, click on one of the following links:

Divorce Reimbursements

Your Community Interest

Community Interest

Down payment

Quit Claim Deeds Transmuting Property

California Property Declaration

California Divorce Attorney

California Family Code

Law Offices of Edward Misleh

Web Site Search

This disclaimer provides that any information provided on this website by The Law  Offices of Edward Misleh, APC is strictly informational and should not be interpreted or considered as legal advice.  If you have a legal concern, you should contact our office to speak with a licensed California Attorney.  Delaying to contact an attorney could result in harm to your interests.

Attorney-Client Relationship

No Attorney-Client Relationship Created by use of this Website: Neither your receipt of information from this website, nor your use of this website to contact The Law Offices of Edward Misleh, APC or one of its attorneys creates an attorney-client relationship between you and The Law Offices of Edward Misleh, APC. As a matter of policy, The Law Offices of Edward Misleh, APC does not accept a new client without first investigating for possible conflicts of interests and obtaining a signed engagement letter. Accordingly, you should not use this website to provide confidential information about a legal matter of yours to The Law Offices of Edward Misleh, APC.

Contacting us by telephone, email or other means, or transmitting information to us, will not establish an attorney-client relationship. The attorney-client relationship can only be established after we have determined that we are able and willing to accept the engagement and we have entered into a written engagement agreement. Until then, do not send any confidential information to us unless we specifically request it. Information communicated without such authorization may not be treated as confidential, secret or otherwise be protected from disclosure, and The Law Offices of Edward Misleh, APC will not be precluded from representing parties adverse to the sender of such information in any matter.

No Legal Advice Intended

This website includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances. You should contact an attorney for advice on specific legal problems.

No Guarantee of Results

Many of the practice summaries and individual attorney biography on this website describe results obtained in matters handled for The Law Offices of Edward Misleh, APC clients. These descriptions are meant only to provide information about the activities and experience of our attorney. They are not intended as a guarantee that the same or similar results can be obtained in every matter undertaken by our attorney; and, you should not assume that a similar result can be obtained in a legal matter of interest to you. The outcome of a particular matter can depend on a variety of factors—including the specific factual and legal circumstances, the ability of opposing counsel, and, often, unexpected developments beyond the control of any client or attorney.

Third Party Websites

As a convenience, this website may provide links to third-party websites. Such linked websites are not under the control of The Law Offices of Edward Misleh, APC, and The Law Offices of Edward Misleh, APC assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the contents of such websites.

No Warranty or Liability

The information in this site is provided “AS-IS,” without representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, including, without limitation, any representation or warranty as to suitability, reliability, applicability, accuracy, merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, non-infringement, result, outcome or any other matter. We do not represent or warrant that such information is or will be up-to-date, complete or accurate, or free from errors, viruses, spyware, malware, adware, worms or other malicious code, or will function to meet your requirements.

You agree that we are not liable to you or others in any way for any damages of any kind or under any theory arising from this site, your access to or use of or reliance on the information in this site, including, but not limited to, liability or damages under contract, tort or other theories or any damages caused by lost data, malicious code, denials of service (including computer crashes), business interruption or other commercial damages or losses, even if we may have been advised of the possibility of such damages.

Authorized Practice of Law

The jurisdiction in which our attorney is licensed to practice is in the State of California. The ability of our attorney to engage in any activities on behalf of a client outside that attorney’s state of licensure is subject to state statutes and professional codes and court rules. The Law Offices of Edward Misleh, APC does not seek, and this website is not intended to solicit, legal employment outside our attorney’s states of licensure that would constitute the unauthorized practice of law.

Intellectual Property Owned by The Law Offices of Edward Misleh, APC

Except as otherwise noted, all trademarks, photographs and other artwork, video clips, and written materials used in this site are protected by copyright laws and are owned or licensed by The Law Offices of Edward Misleh, APC. You may download information from our site for your temporary, personal, non-commercial use only. None of these items may be copied, reproduced, downloaded, posted, transmitted, broadcast or otherwise distributed in any manner without our prior written consent.

Privacy Policy
Site Map
Avvo - Rate your Lawyer. Get Free Legal Advice.
We gladly accept Visa, MasterCard, Discover, American Express.
Copyright 2023 The Law Offices of Edward Misleh, APC
Web site hosting by All Brevard Web Sites