The Law Office of Edward Misleh
The Law Office of Edward Misleh
Skip to content
  • Home Page
  • Areas of Practice
    • Divorce Attorney
    • Domestic Violence Attorney
    • Child Custody Attorney
    • Child Support Attorney
    • Spousal Support Attorney
    • Community Property Attorney
    • Guardianship Attorney
    • Family Law Attorney
    • Adoption Attorney
    • California Attorney Blog
  • Resources
    • Forms
    • California Attorney Blog
    • Our Office
    • Website Search
    • Site Map
  • The Law Offices
  • Contact Us

-

Home » Areas of Practice » Community Property » Quit Claim Deed Transmutation

Quit Claim Deed Transmutation

Posted on October 25, 2019November 15, 2019 by edmisleh

Quit Claim Deed Transmutation

The first consideration that will come into play  for a quit claim deed transmutation is if the property was acquired during marriage.  If so, the property is community property.  Community property is any asset or debt incurred during marriage;  from the date of marriage to the date of separation.  The exception to this rule include anything acquired by either spouse before marriage, anything inherited or received as a gift by either spouse, and anything acquired after the date of separation.  Everything else is community property.

So, what happens when the spouses change title to a house they purchased with a quit claim deed?  Well, you can be sure that during the divorce, the spouse who has the property titled in their name will be claiming that the house is their separate property and not community property.  Is this possible?  Did spouse lose any interest by signing a quit claim deed?  Was there a quit claim deed transmutation?  Let’s see.


What is a Transmutation?

Family Code §852 states that a transmutation occurs where the spouses have changed the character and nature of a community or separate property asset.  The change can be from separate property to community property, from community property to the separate property or from one spouse’s separate property to the other spouse’s separate property.  There are three types of transmutations:

  • Separate property to community property;
  • Community property to separate property;  and,
  • Separate property of one spouse to the separate property of the other spouse.

In any situation the spouse taken off title may have no intention whatsoever to give up an interest in their the property, certainly at least not for purposes of a divorce.  The spouse taken off the deed will argue that no quit claim deed transmutation occurred.   And, of course, the spouse whose name is on the deed will claim that a a quit claim deed transmutation occurred.


Quit Claim Deed Transmutation Scenario of Events

A house is purchased by both spouses during their marriage and is deeded to both spouses – both spouse’ names are on the deed.  The house was purchased during marriage and is community property.  Now, during the marriage, the spouses want to refinance the loan on the house to take advantage of a better mortgage rate.  However, they find out that one spouse’s credit score is not high enough to qualify for refinancing.  The spouses get the bright idea to not use the spouse with the bad credit to qualify for the loan and the spouse with the bad credit signs a quit claim deed.  The deed is now title in the name of the spouse with good credit.  What has now happened is that one spouse has the house titled in their name while the other is no longer on the deed.  Is this a quit claim deed transmutation?  Not necessarily.  How the spouse whose name is no longer on the deed lost all interest in the house?  Not likely.


How does Undue Influence Affect Transmutations?

A quit claim deed transmutation that results in one spouse obtaining an advantage over the other spouse creates a presumption that the transaction is invalid due to undue influence.  Family Code §852(a) states that the spouse giving up his or her rights to property must expressly acknowledge in a declaration that they join in, consent or accept the transmutation.  What this means is that in order for there to be no undue influence, the spouse must understand that they are giving up a property right.  This express declaration cannot be oral.  This express declaration must be in writing.  It must contain clear language that the spouse understands they have a right to the property and that they are knowing giving up that right.  In order for there to be a transmutation by quit claim deed as to real property, the quit claim deed transmutation must contain the express declaration right on the face of the deed so it is clearly noticeable and clear.  A quit claim deed transmutation from two spouses into the name of one spouse with no other language supporting the transfer or stating that the property is to be the separate property of the other spouse does not support a transmutation argument or satisfy Family Code §852.

Furthermore, even if a quit claim deed transmutation is made and contains an express declaration, it is not automatically valid.  All that has successfully been completed at this point is a change in title and satisfying Family Code §852.  In California the transmutation law was created to ensure that spouses are protected from the other spouse which gave rise to the concept and consequential statutes of “Fiduciary Duty”.

A spouse’s fiduciary duty is found in Family Code §1100 which states:  each spouse has a duty to act in accordance with the general rules governing fiduciary relationships in the management and control of community property until such time as the assets and liabilities are divided by the parties or a court.  This duty includes the obligations to make full disclosure to the other spouse of all material facts and information on the existence, characterization, and valuation of assets in which the community has and to act with fiduciary responsibility in all transactions regarding management and control of community property.

In short, this means that one spouse cannot take advantage of their spouse in property dealings.  Furthermore, when an asset is transmuted during marriage without consideration (i.e. without compensation for the fair value), the quit claim deed transmutation is presumed invalid.  The party claiming validity of the quit claim deed transmutation must rebut the presumption of undue influence.


Rebutting the Presumption of Undue Influence

In order to rebut the presumption of undue influence three things must be shown.  The advantaged spouse must show:

  • The transfer was made freely and voluntarily;
  • The transfer was made with full knowledge of all the facts;  and.
  • The transfer was made with a complete understanding of the effect of the transfer.

This is an uphill battle for the advantaged spouse who maintains that the transmutation of community property and quit claim deed is valid.  The spouse holding titled must submit evidence regarding the transfer, timing of the transfer, and intentions and understanding of the spouses at the time of the transfer.


CALL NOW TO MAKE AN APPOINTMENT

321-951-9164

For more information on California Community Property, click on one of the following links:

Community Property

Community Interest

Your Community Interest

Who Gets The Family Home in Divorce

Quit Claim Deeds Transmuting Property

Reimbursements

Divorce Reimbursements

Family Home

Property Apportionment

California Family Code

Law Offices of Edward Misleh

Web Site Search

This disclaimer provides that any information provided on this website by The Law  Offices of Edward Misleh, APC is strictly informational and should not be interpreted or considered as legal advice.  If you have a legal concern, you should contact our office to speak with a licensed California Attorney.  Delaying to contact an attorney could result in harm to your interests.

Attorney-Client Relationship

No Attorney-Client Relationship Created by use of this Website: Neither your receipt of information from this website, nor your use of this website to contact The Law Offices of Edward Misleh, APC or one of its attorneys creates an attorney-client relationship between you and The Law Offices of Edward Misleh, APC. As a matter of policy, The Law Offices of Edward Misleh, APC does not accept a new client without first investigating for possible conflicts of interests and obtaining a signed engagement letter. Accordingly, you should not use this website to provide confidential information about a legal matter of yours to The Law Offices of Edward Misleh, APC.

Contacting us by telephone, email or other means, or transmitting information to us, will not establish an attorney-client relationship. The attorney-client relationship can only be established after we have determined that we are able and willing to accept the engagement and we have entered into a written engagement agreement. Until then, do not send any confidential information to us unless we specifically request it. Information communicated without such authorization may not be treated as confidential, secret or otherwise be protected from disclosure, and The Law Offices of Edward Misleh, APC will not be precluded from representing parties adverse to the sender of such information in any matter.

No Legal Advice Intended

This website includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances. You should contact an attorney for advice on specific legal problems.

No Guarantee of Results

Many of the practice summaries and individual attorney biography on this website describe results obtained in matters handled for The Law Offices of Edward Misleh, APC clients. These descriptions are meant only to provide information about the activities and experience of our attorney. They are not intended as a guarantee that the same or similar results can be obtained in every matter undertaken by our attorney; and, you should not assume that a similar result can be obtained in a legal matter of interest to you. The outcome of a particular matter can depend on a variety of factors—including the specific factual and legal circumstances, the ability of opposing counsel, and, often, unexpected developments beyond the control of any client or attorney.

Third Party Websites

As a convenience, this website may provide links to third-party websites. Such linked websites are not under the control of The Law Offices of Edward Misleh, APC, and The Law Offices of Edward Misleh, APC assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the contents of such websites.

No Warranty or Liability

The information in this site is provided “AS-IS,” without representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, including, without limitation, any representation or warranty as to suitability, reliability, applicability, accuracy, merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, non-infringement, result, outcome or any other matter. We do not represent or warrant that such information is or will be up-to-date, complete or accurate, or free from errors, viruses, spyware, malware, adware, worms or other malicious code, or will function to meet your requirements.

You agree that we are not liable to you or others in any way for any damages of any kind or under any theory arising from this site, your access to or use of or reliance on the information in this site, including, but not limited to, liability or damages under contract, tort or other theories or any damages caused by lost data, malicious code, denials of service (including computer crashes), business interruption or other commercial damages or losses, even if we may have been advised of the possibility of such damages.

Authorized Practice of Law

The jurisdiction in which our attorney is licensed to practice is in the State of California. The ability of our attorney to engage in any activities on behalf of a client outside that attorney’s state of licensure is subject to state statutes and professional codes and court rules. The Law Offices of Edward Misleh, APC does not seek, and this website is not intended to solicit, legal employment outside our attorney’s states of licensure that would constitute the unauthorized practice of law.

Intellectual Property Owned by The Law Offices of Edward Misleh, APC

Except as otherwise noted, all trademarks, photographs and other artwork, video clips, and written materials used in this site are protected by copyright laws and are owned or licensed by The Law Offices of Edward Misleh, APC. You may download information from our site for your temporary, personal, non-commercial use only. None of these items may be copied, reproduced, downloaded, posted, transmitted, broadcast or otherwise distributed in any manner without our prior written consent.

Privacy Policy
Site Map
Avvo - Rate your Lawyer. Get Free Legal Advice.
We gladly accept Visa, MasterCard, Discover, American Express.
Copyright 2023 The Law Offices of Edward Misleh, APC
Web site hosting by All Brevard Web Sites