The Law Office of Edward Misleh
The Law Office of Edward Misleh
Skip to content
  • Home Page
  • Areas of Practice
    • Divorce Attorney
    • Domestic Violence Attorney
    • Child Custody Attorney
    • Child Support Attorney
    • Spousal Support Attorney
    • Community Property Attorney
    • Guardianship Attorney
    • Family Law Attorney
    • Adoption Attorney
    • California Attorney Blog
  • Resources
    • Forms
    • California Attorney Blog
    • Our Office
    • Website Search
    • Site Map
  • The Law Offices
  • Contact Us

-

Home » Areas of Practice » Community Property » Reimbursements

Reimbursements

Posted on October 25, 2019February 2, 2020 by Editor

During a California divorce, one spouse may be entitled to be reimbursed when the other spouse has exclusive use of community property or when one spouse makes payments on a community debt.

The Law Offices of Edward Misleh, APC is a law firm that in Northern California with the services they need and deserve when addressing their legal matters.  Our firm handles all aspects of California community property, to include:  dividing marital assets, separate property, retirement plans, 401(k) and 403(b) plans, CalPERS, CalSTRS, pensions, veteran benefits, DFAS, Tricare.  Call now our Lawyer Hotline.    Call now 321-951-9164.

Reimbursements

Reimbursements for use of community property or payments on community debts are called Watts Charges and Epstein Credits.  Although there are other classifications for reimbursements, these are the two most common to a divorce action.


Divorce Reimbursements

You may be entitled to divorce reimbursements for payments you made during your marriage.


Watts Charges

Reimbursements can come in the form of Watts Charges. which are charges one spouse incurs after date of separation for their exclusive use of community property.   When one spouse has exclusive use of a family home or vehicle, the community will be entitled to reimbursements for the value of this use.  The reimbursements come in the way of a “charge” against their portion of the community property they are to receive.

Claims for Watts charges, for reimbursements to the community for post-separation use of community assets, are generally disfavored by the court unless the spouse seeking credit has given prior written notice to the other spouse of their intent to seek such a credit.  Claims will ordinarily be considered retroactive only to the date of such actual written notice of the claim.


Epstein Credits

Reimbursements can be credits that a spouse is to receive from community property for the payment of a community debt using their separate assets. When one spouse pays on a community loan or a community credit card debt they are entitled to a credit from the community. The spouse who wants to claim Epstein credits has the burden of proof regarding the community nature of the obligation, the balance on date of separation, the post-separation payment and the separate property source of the payment.


Frick Credits

The community has a right to divorce reimbursements when a spouse uses community property to pay his/her separate property obligations.


Child Support Payments

One spouse can request reimbursements when the other spouse is using community property to make child support payments or spousal support payments.  The paying spouse’s obligation is a separate debt resulting from from another relationship, prior or during marriage.


One Spouse’s Tort Liability

Community property used to satisfy one spouse’s tort liability or student loan debt.


Reimbursements for Premarital Funds Used to Start a Business

The spouse who contributed the funds to start a business during marriage will be reimbursed provided they can prove (generally by tracing via financial records) that the separate funds went into the purchase or creation of the business.  A common scenario is when separate funds (funds owned before the marriage, acquired during the marriage by gift or inheritance, or after the date of separation) are used to start a business.

Under California Family Code 2640(b), contributions made on or after January 1, 1984 will be reimbursed (again, to the extent that the contributing spouse can trace) unless the contributing spouse has made a written waiver of their right to reimbursement – a transmutation.  The amount reimbursed is the amount contributed, without interest.  This applies not only to down payments, but also to the purchase but payments for improvements, or payments on any loan principal (but not interest payments, or payments for taxes or insurance).  The reimbursement is capped at the amount of the equity in the business at the time of divorce.


Reimbursements for Separate Funds Used to Acquire a Joint Marriage Asset

The spouse who contributed the funds will be reimbursed in a divorce action, provided they can prove (generally by tracing via financial records) that the separate funds went into the asset.  A common scenario is when premarital funds (funds owned before the marriage, or acquired during the marriage by gift or inheritance) are used to acquire property that is now in joint title.

Under California Family Code 2640(b), contributions made on or after January 1, 1984 will be reimbursed (again, to the extent that the contributing spouse can trace) unless the contributing spouse has made a written waiver of their right to reimbursement – a transmutation.  The amount reimbursed is the amount contributed, without interest.  This applies not only to down payments, but also to payments for improvements, and payments on the principle (but not interest payments, or payments for taxes or insurance) on a loan that financed the purchase or improvements.  The reimbursement is capped at the amount of the equity in the property at the time of divorce.


Reimbursements for Separate Funds Used to Pay Community Debts

Most notably is one spouse who uses separate funds to pay joint debts after the parties have separated.  Generally the paying spouse will be reimbursed.  This most commonly occurs where a person pays from their separate income (such as employment income earned after separation) makes payments on an existing community obligation (such as a mortgage on a parcel of real estate, or a balance on credit card).  There are exceptions, however—for example, when the payments are made to discharge a spousal or child support obligation;  or when the payments were to preserve an asset (like a house or car) that the person is using, and the amount being paid is not significantly greater than the use value of the asset, such as its rental value.  However, there may be no reimbursement for mortgage payments on the residence when the paying spouse is living in the house after the parties separate.

The spouse who contributed the funds will be reimbursed in a divorce action, provided they can prove (generally by tracing via financial records) that the separate funds went to payment of a community or joint debt.  A common scenario is when one spouse uses separate funds (funds acquired before the marriage, during marriage by gift or inheritance, or after the date of separation) to pay on a community or joint debt.

Under California Family Code 2640(b), contributions made on or after January 1, 1984 will be reimbursed (again, to the extent that the contributing spouse can trace) unless the contributing spouse has made a written waiver of their right to reimbursement – a transmutation.  The amount reimbursed is the amount contributed, without interest – one half of the community debt.  The reimbursement is capped at the amount of the equity in the property at the time of divorce.


Reimbursements for Separate Funds Used for the Other Spouse Acquisition of Separate Property

This most commonly occurs when a person owns real estate before marriage, and after marriage the other person uses their separate property funds to make payments on the mortgage, or to pay for improvements on the property.  Again, the reimbursement is only to the extent the contributor can trace the funds, the reimbursement is without interest, it is given only if there was no written waiver of the reimbursement right, and it applies to principle payments but not to interest payments or taxes or insurance.  The statute providing for reimbursement for this type of reimbursement (where funds are used for the acquisition of the other party’s separate property) was enacted relatively recently, and it is unclear whether it applies to contributions made before January 1, 2005.


Separate Funds Used for Living Expenses During Marriage

There is no reimbursement for one spouse’s use of their separate funds during marriage for living expenses.  If a spouse uses their separate property funds to pay for such things as medical expenses, vacations, gifts, property insurance, property taxes, clothing, utilities, or other living expenses, the law presumes these were gifts to the community, and there is no right of reimbursement.


Reimbursement for Community Funds Used During Marriage to Pay One Spouse’s Premarital Debt

The community will generally be reimbursed for the payments (which is another way of saying the party who incurred the debt will reimburse the other party for one-half the amount paid).  This is true regardless of which spouse applied the joint funds to pay the debt, and regardless of whether the debt was paid in whole or in part.  However, the reimbursement claim must be made within three years after the party first acquires knowledge of the facts giving rise to the reimbursement right.  And, the claim must be made in the marital dissolution action (assuming the three years have not expired) or it is waived.


Reimbursements for Education Payments

The community may be reimbursed for funds spent for education or training of one spouse that substantially enhances that person’s earning capacity.  The payments include such things as tuition, books, fees, transportation, supplies, as well as payments on a student loan even if the loan was incurred prior to marriage.  Ordinary, day-to-day living expenses while a student are not reimbursed.  There is exception to the reimbursement right.  Reimbursement may be eliminated or reduced if the community has already benefited substantially from the education (a benefit which is presumed to have occurred if the payments were made over ten years ago).  Another exception is if the education has substantially reduced a party’s need for spousal support.


Reimbursements for Community Funds for a Prior Marriage Support Payments

The community is reimbursed provided the spouse who incurred the obligation had their own separate property available to make the payment, but used community funds instead.  The community’s right to reimbursement must be exercised within three years after the party claiming the reimbursement has acquired knowledge of the facts giving rise to the right.  And, the claim must be made in the marital dissolution action (assuming the three years have not expired) or it is waived.


Reimbursements for Community Funds Used to Pay on a Personal Injury Claim

There is a right to reimbursement from the damages received in a personal injury claim when the personal injury damages are the separate property of the injured party, and expenses connected with the injury are paid with the other spouse’s separate property or with community property.  Be aware that you must consider the time of the injury and the facts surrounding the injury to determine whether or not the damages are characterized separate property of the injured party or of the community (belonging to both spouses but often allocated to the injured party in a divorce).


CALL NOW TO MAKE AN APPOINTMENT

321-951-9164

For more information on divorce credits, debts, and community property, click on one of the following links:

Divorce

Simple Divorce

California Divorce

Community Interest

Your Community Interest

Dividing Divorce Debts

Joinder of Pension

Quit Claim Deeds Transmuting Property

Family Home Division

Property Apportionment

Quit Claim Deed Transmutation

California Divorce Attorney

California Family Code

Law Offices of Edward Misleh

Web Site Search

This disclaimer provides that any information provided on this website by The Law  Offices of Edward Misleh, APC is strictly informational and should not be interpreted or considered as legal advice.  If you have a legal concern, you should contact our office to speak with a licensed California Attorney.  Delaying to contact an attorney could result in harm to your interests.

Attorney-Client Relationship

No Attorney-Client Relationship Created by use of this Website: Neither your receipt of information from this website, nor your use of this website to contact The Law Offices of Edward Misleh, APC or one of its attorneys creates an attorney-client relationship between you and The Law Offices of Edward Misleh, APC. As a matter of policy, The Law Offices of Edward Misleh, APC does not accept a new client without first investigating for possible conflicts of interests and obtaining a signed engagement letter. Accordingly, you should not use this website to provide confidential information about a legal matter of yours to The Law Offices of Edward Misleh, APC.

Contacting us by telephone, email or other means, or transmitting information to us, will not establish an attorney-client relationship. The attorney-client relationship can only be established after we have determined that we are able and willing to accept the engagement and we have entered into a written engagement agreement. Until then, do not send any confidential information to us unless we specifically request it. Information communicated without such authorization may not be treated as confidential, secret or otherwise be protected from disclosure, and The Law Offices of Edward Misleh, APC will not be precluded from representing parties adverse to the sender of such information in any matter.

No Legal Advice Intended

This website includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances. You should contact an attorney for advice on specific legal problems.

No Guarantee of Results

Many of the practice summaries and individual attorney biography on this website describe results obtained in matters handled for The Law Offices of Edward Misleh, APC clients. These descriptions are meant only to provide information about the activities and experience of our attorney. They are not intended as a guarantee that the same or similar results can be obtained in every matter undertaken by our attorney; and, you should not assume that a similar result can be obtained in a legal matter of interest to you. The outcome of a particular matter can depend on a variety of factors—including the specific factual and legal circumstances, the ability of opposing counsel, and, often, unexpected developments beyond the control of any client or attorney.

Third Party Websites

As a convenience, this website may provide links to third-party websites. Such linked websites are not under the control of The Law Offices of Edward Misleh, APC, and The Law Offices of Edward Misleh, APC assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the contents of such websites.

No Warranty or Liability

The information in this site is provided “AS-IS,” without representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, including, without limitation, any representation or warranty as to suitability, reliability, applicability, accuracy, merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, non-infringement, result, outcome or any other matter. We do not represent or warrant that such information is or will be up-to-date, complete or accurate, or free from errors, viruses, spyware, malware, adware, worms or other malicious code, or will function to meet your requirements.

You agree that we are not liable to you or others in any way for any damages of any kind or under any theory arising from this site, your access to or use of or reliance on the information in this site, including, but not limited to, liability or damages under contract, tort or other theories or any damages caused by lost data, malicious code, denials of service (including computer crashes), business interruption or other commercial damages or losses, even if we may have been advised of the possibility of such damages.

Authorized Practice of Law

The jurisdiction in which our attorney is licensed to practice is in the State of California. The ability of our attorney to engage in any activities on behalf of a client outside that attorney’s state of licensure is subject to state statutes and professional codes and court rules. The Law Offices of Edward Misleh, APC does not seek, and this website is not intended to solicit, legal employment outside our attorney’s states of licensure that would constitute the unauthorized practice of law.

Intellectual Property Owned by The Law Offices of Edward Misleh, APC

Except as otherwise noted, all trademarks, photographs and other artwork, video clips, and written materials used in this site are protected by copyright laws and are owned or licensed by The Law Offices of Edward Misleh, APC. You may download information from our site for your temporary, personal, non-commercial use only. None of these items may be copied, reproduced, downloaded, posted, transmitted, broadcast or otherwise distributed in any manner without our prior written consent.

Privacy Policy
Site Map
Avvo - Rate your Lawyer. Get Free Legal Advice.
We gladly accept Visa, MasterCard, Discover, American Express.
Copyright 2023 The Law Offices of Edward Misleh, APC
Web site hosting by All Brevard Web Sites